Why traditional Marketing Mix Modelling still matters

For decades, Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) has helped marketers understand the performance of media and the influence of factors such as competitor spend and seasonality on business KPIs. MMM’s strength lies in cutting through the noise to isolate media’s effect and determine Return on Investment (ROI), making it a trusted measurement tool.

Today, MMM’s relevance has only grown. Privacy restrictions, cookie deprecation and tracking limitations have undermined user-level attribution, making it harder to capture full customer journeys. Unlike those methods, MMM works on aggregated spend and outcome data, making it resilient to these shifts. It’s therefore re-established itself as a core framework for marketing measurement.

The limitation of traditional MMM in measuring ROI

Traditionally, MMM has produced single ROI estimates that downplay the uncertainty behind them. This leaves decision-makers without a clear sense of investment risk. Bayesian MMM addresses this by generating an ROI range for different variables such as media channels. This shifts the focus from single estimates to a range of ROIs with their associated likelihood of being reached. This allows stakeholders to consider both expected returns and the likelihood of achieving them, making Bayesian approaches increasingly attractive in today’s market.

How Bayesian MMM improves marketing measurement

Bayesian MMM builds on the same foundation as traditional MMM: modelling the relationship between inputs, such as media spend, promotions, competitor activity and external factors, with business outcomes like sales or conversions. The difference lies in how uncertainty is handled and how results are used.

In traditional MMM, each media channel is given an indication of its average effect; for example, the return from £1 spent on TV. These averages are used to estimate ROI or CPA and to build response curves that show how returns flatten with spend. While these curves can guide budget reallocation, traditional MMM doesn’t provide clarity on uncertainty around the effect of increasing spend. Therefore, it doesn’t directly answer the practical question: what is the probability this channel’s ROI exceeds a threshold?

Bayesian MMM reframes the problem by incorporating prior expectations, often informed by industry knowledge and previous experiments (e.g. that media ROI should be positive and within a plausible range), and updates them with the data being used within the model. Using advanced sampling methods, it generates thousands of plausible scenarios that provide us with a range of probable outcomes. From these we can produce:

  • Credible intervals: Direct probability statements (e.g. “There’s a 90% chance TV ROI lies between 1.6 and 2.4”)
  • Risk-aware ROI estimates: Probabilities of hitting or missing certain thresholds, not just averages
  • Scenario simulations: Budget reallocations tested under uncertainty, showing both expected impact and the likelihood of achieving specific targets

This changes planning decisions. In a frequentist model, two channels with an average ROI of approximately 1.8 may appear equal. Under Bayesian MMM, you might see that Channel A has a 90% probability of ROI > 1.5 while Channel B has only 50% of reaching that same ROI; a fundamental shift in how risk is judged.

Because Bayesian MMM encodes industry and marketeer knowledge and can generate realistic results even with noisy or limited data, it is well suited to today’s environment, where privacy restrictions limit user-level tracking and decision-makers require not only efficiency numbers but also a clear view of the risks behind them.

From single ROI estimates to risk-aware decisions

Marketing measurement is moving from an era of single-number estimates to outputting a range of estimates with their associated probabilities that allow for risk-aware decision-making. Traditional MMM has long been effective in quantifying how different media channels have affected business metrics, but its treatment of uncertainty leaves investment risk hidden. Bayesian MMM fills this gap by reframing outputs into probabilities, enabling scenario simulations and supporting more robust budget optimisation.

Bayesian MMM generates a range of values that show how different media channels have affected business metrics. The outputs of this probabilistic method are a range of media contributions, ROIs and response curves with uncertainty bands. These equip marketers with a richer and more realistic understanding of their investments. In a world of shrinking user-level data and growing measurement challenges, it is not just a technical upgrade but a practical evolution, one that is increasingly shaping how marketing decisions are made today.

Talk To Us

Want to find out how you can accelerate growth? Drop us a line and our team will be in touch.

triangle
triangle