Why traditional Marketing Mix Modelling still matters
For decades, Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) has helped marketers understand the performance of media and the influence of factors such as competitor spend and seasonality on business KPIs. MMM’s strength lies in cutting through the noise to isolate media’s effect and determine Return on Investment (ROI), making it a trusted measurement tool.
Today, MMM’s relevance has only grown. Privacy restrictions, cookie deprecation and tracking limitations have undermined user-level attribution, making it harder to capture full customer journeys. Unlike those methods, MMM works on aggregated spend and outcome data, making it resilient to these shifts. It’s therefore re-established itself as a core framework for marketing measurement.
The limitation of traditional MMM in measuring ROI
Traditionally, MMM has produced single ROI estimates that downplay the uncertainty behind them. This leaves decision-makers without a clear sense of investment risk. Bayesian MMM addresses this by generating an ROI range for different variables such as media channels. This shifts the focus from single estimates to a range of ROIs with their associated likelihood of being reached. This allows stakeholders to consider both expected returns and the likelihood of achieving them, making Bayesian approaches increasingly attractive in today’s market.